Abstract
Essentialism, a fundamental belief of the fixedness of social group essences, is often associated with negative intergroup outcomes. However, research is yet to explore the role of essentialism in intergroup conflicts, despite their prevalence. To address this gap, we conducted the first direct examination on how essentialism influences conflict management toward out-group members. Moreover, we examined perspective-taking as a positive factor in improving conflict management among essentialist individuals relative to their non-essentialist counterparts in intergroup contexts. Results across three experiments provided little support to the negative effect of essentialism on intergroup (vs. intragroup) conflict management. Yet, we found that perspective-taking promoted the use of problem solving and improved one’s own gain and the dyad’s joint gain among essentialist individuals, but not non-essentialist individuals, in intergroup (vs. intragroup) conflict situations. This research suggests that when coupled with perspective-taking, essentialism can promote constructive conflict resolution in intergroup contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 483-507 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 8 Mar 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2019 |
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by grant awarded to Melody Manchi Chao from Research Grants Council, General Research Fund (#16400314) in Hong Kong.
Keywords
- conflict management
- empathy
- essentialism
- intergroup conflict
- perspective-taking