Which Cultural Dimensions Predict Variations in Emotional Conformity? An Extension of Vishkin et al. (2023) Across 28 Nations

  • Peter B. SMITH
  • , Alexander KIRCHNER-HÄUSLER
  • , Lusine GRIGORYAN
  • , Vivian Miu-Chi LUN
  • , Olga LOPUKHOVA
  • , Lorena Perez FLORIANO
  • , Paola Eunice Diaz RIVERA
  • , Ammar ABBAS
  • , Antonia PAPASTYLIANOU
  • , Doriana TRIPODI
  • , Ceren GUNSOY
  • , Anna HAKOBJANYAN
  • , Claudio TORRES
  • , Ani GRIGORYAN
  • , Ömer Erdem KOÇAK
  • , Maria Luisa Mendes TEXEIRA
  • , Heyla A. SELIM
  • , Taciano L. MILFONT
  • , Alin GAVRELIUC
  • , Dana GAVRELIUC
  • Michal BILEWICZ, Catherine T. KWANTES, Joel ANDERSON, Matthew J. EASTERBROOK, Yasin KOC, Gisela Isabel DELFINO, Phattanakit CHOBTHAMKIT, Ping HU, Maria EFREMOVA, Mary Angeline DAGANZO, Byron ADAMS, Natsuki OGUSU, Chee-Seng TAN, Mary Ruth Guevara MALDONADO, Siugmin LAY, Vladimer GAMSAKHURDIA, Vanessa A. CASTILLO

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Despite being a classic social psychology topic, cultural variability in conformity has only been examined systematically in the last few decades. Vishkin et al. reported evidence that conformity of experienced emotions and of valued emotions is stronger in individualistic cultures. We tested the replicability of this finding using data from 28 nations (N = 6,168), incorporating two further relevant cultural predictors of cultural differences: flexibility-monumentalism and tightness-looseness. Contrasting effects regarding valence were found for conformity of experienced emotions and of valued emotions. Conformity of experienced positive emotions and of valued negative emotions was predicted by individualism, monumentalism, and looseness. The results are discussed in terms of the distinction between injunctive and descriptive norms and cultural variations in the salience of positive and negative emotions. Using additional indicators of cultural difference yields a fuller understanding of these effects than that provided by the contrast between individualism and collectivism. The use of deviation scores provides a useful operationalization of variations in conformity.
Original languageEnglish
Article number00220221251376543
Pages (from-to)911-928
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Volume56
Issue number8
Early online date8 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work of Maria Efremova was supported by the framework of the Basic Research Program at HSE University. The work of Chee-Seng Tan was supported by the Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman CAP RC Excellent Award (6401/0018). The work of Vivian Miu-Chi Lun was supported by Lingnan University Direct Grant (DR22B7). The work of Heyla A. Selim was supported by ORF-2025-1204, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The work of Anna Hakobjanyan and Ani Grigoryan was supported by the framework of the Basic Research Program at Yerevan State University.

Keywords

  • conformity
  • emotion
  • flexibility-monumentalism
  • individualism-collectivism
  • tightness-looseness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which Cultural Dimensions Predict Variations in Emotional Conformity? An Extension of Vishkin et al. (2023) Across 28 Nations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this