Abstract
We study firm investment in abatement technology under a heterogeneous‐firm framework. We find that more‐productive firms make more (less) investment in abatement technology if investment and productivity are complements (substitutes). Under linear demand, firms’ abatement investments exhibit an inverted U‐shape with respect to productivity level. This finding is in contrast to results in existing studies. We also find that in response to tightened environmental regulations, more‐productive firms raise their respective investments in abatement technology, whereas less‐productive firms do the opposite. More‐productive firms have lower pollution emission intensity. The key theoretical predictions are confirmed by empirical tests using Chinese data.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 637-662 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Economics |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
The authors are very grateful to Hao Li (co-editor), two referees and Ujjayant Chakravorty for their comments and suggestions. The authors benefitted from presenting the paper in the 2012 Biannual Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association (December 2012) and the World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists (July 2014).Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who invest more in advanced abatement technology : theory and evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver