Why advocate pancritical rationalism?

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper provides a rationale for advocating pancritical rationalism. First, it argues that the advocate of critical rationalism may accept (but not be internally justified in accepting) that there is ‘justification’ in an externalist sense, specifically that certain procedures can track truth, and suggest that this recognition should inform practice; that one should try to determine which sources and methods are appropriate for various aspects of inquiry, and to what extent they are. Second, it argues that if there is external justification, then a critical rationalist is better off than a dogmatist from an evolutionary perspective.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRethinking Popper
EditorsZuzana Parusniková, Robert S. Cohen
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages81-89
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781402093388
ISBN (Print)9781402093371
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventConference on Rethinking Popper - Department for Analytic Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Prague, Czech Republic
Duration: 10 Sep 200710 Sep 2007

Publication series

NameBoston Studies in The Philosophy of Science
PublisherSpringer
Volume272

Conference

ConferenceConference on Rethinking Popper
CountryCzech Republic
CityPrague
Period10/09/0710/09/07

Fingerprint

Rationalism
Justification
Critical Rationalism
Externalist
Rationalist
Evolutionary

Cite this

ROWBOTTOM, D. P., & BUENO, O. (2009). Why advocate pancritical rationalism? In Z. Parusniková, & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), Rethinking Popper (pp. 81-89). (Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science; Vol. 272). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_7
ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick ; BUENO, Otávio. / Why advocate pancritical rationalism?. Rethinking Popper. editor / Zuzana Parusniková ; Robert S. Cohen. Springer Netherlands, 2009. pp. 81-89 (Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science).
@inproceedings{9f85bb4ea8514ce0808d494eec05a3d7,
title = "Why advocate pancritical rationalism?",
abstract = "This paper provides a rationale for advocating pancritical rationalism. First, it argues that the advocate of critical rationalism may accept (but not be internally justified in accepting) that there is ‘justification’ in an externalist sense, specifically that certain procedures can track truth, and suggest that this recognition should inform practice; that one should try to determine which sources and methods are appropriate for various aspects of inquiry, and to what extent they are. Second, it argues that if there is external justification, then a critical rationalist is better off than a dogmatist from an evolutionary perspective.",
author = "ROWBOTTOM, {Darrell Patrick} and Ot{\'a}vio BUENO",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781402093371",
series = "Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
pages = "81--89",
editor = "Zuzana Parusnikov{\'a} and Cohen, {Robert S.}",
booktitle = "Rethinking Popper",
address = "Netherlands",

}

ROWBOTTOM, DP & BUENO, O 2009, Why advocate pancritical rationalism? in Z Parusniková & RS Cohen (eds), Rethinking Popper. Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol. 272, Springer Netherlands, pp. 81-89, Conference on Rethinking Popper, Prague, Czech Republic, 10/09/07. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_7

Why advocate pancritical rationalism? / ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick; BUENO, Otávio.

Rethinking Popper. ed. / Zuzana Parusniková; Robert S. Cohen. Springer Netherlands, 2009. p. 81-89 (Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science; Vol. 272).

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Why advocate pancritical rationalism?

AU - ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick

AU - BUENO, Otávio

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - This paper provides a rationale for advocating pancritical rationalism. First, it argues that the advocate of critical rationalism may accept (but not be internally justified in accepting) that there is ‘justification’ in an externalist sense, specifically that certain procedures can track truth, and suggest that this recognition should inform practice; that one should try to determine which sources and methods are appropriate for various aspects of inquiry, and to what extent they are. Second, it argues that if there is external justification, then a critical rationalist is better off than a dogmatist from an evolutionary perspective.

AB - This paper provides a rationale for advocating pancritical rationalism. First, it argues that the advocate of critical rationalism may accept (but not be internally justified in accepting) that there is ‘justification’ in an externalist sense, specifically that certain procedures can track truth, and suggest that this recognition should inform practice; that one should try to determine which sources and methods are appropriate for various aspects of inquiry, and to what extent they are. Second, it argues that if there is external justification, then a critical rationalist is better off than a dogmatist from an evolutionary perspective.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2124

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2850

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_7

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_7

M3 - Conference paper (refereed)

SN - 9781402093371

T3 - Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science

SP - 81

EP - 89

BT - Rethinking Popper

A2 - Parusniková, Zuzana

A2 - Cohen, Robert S.

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -

ROWBOTTOM DP, BUENO O. Why advocate pancritical rationalism? In Parusniková Z, Cohen RS, editors, Rethinking Popper. Springer Netherlands. 2009. p. 81-89. (Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_7