Why do we need a theory of implementation?

André CURTIS-TRUDEL*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The received view of computation is methodologically bifurcated: it offers different accounts of computation in the mathematical and physical cases. But little in the way of argument has been given for this approach. This paper rectifies the situation by arguing that the alternative, a unified account, is untenable. Furthermore, once these issues are brought into sharper relief we can see that work remains to be done to illuminate the relationship between physical and mathematical computation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1067-1091
Number of pages25
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume73
Issue number4
Early online date20 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why do we need a theory of implementation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this