Why Might an Instrumentalist Endorse Bohmian Mechanics?

Darrell P. ROWBOTTOM

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99642-0_6

Why Might an Instrumentalist Endorse Bohmian Mechanics?

Darrell P. ROWBOTTOM^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Lingnan University

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference Proceedings › Book Chapter › Research › peer-review

Abstract

I show that Bohmian mechanics may be highly valued by anti-realists, such as cognitive instrumentalists, although it is typically understood to be a realist interpretation of quantum mechanics. I argue that it possesses significant theoretical virtues – and is a vehicle for fostering non-factive understanding concerning how many phenomena interrelate – even if it fails to be approximately true (or true to any significant degree in what it says about unobservable entities). I employ several examples from the history of science to illuminate and support this view.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality : Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy
Editors	Valia ALLORI
Publisher	Springer, Cham
Chapter	6
Pages	81-94
Number of pages	14
ISBN (Electronic)	9783030996420
ISBN (Print)	9783030996413
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99642-0_6
Publication status	Published - 28 Jul 2022

Publication series

Name	Synthese Library
Volume	460
ISSN (Print)	0166-6991
ISSN (Electronic)	2542-8292

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong’s RGC (‘Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues’) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Funding Information:
My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong’s RGC (‘Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues’) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version.

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong’s RGC (‘Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues’) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-99642-0_6

https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-99642-0_6

Cite this

@inbook{a554c127c8e34aab8d9d59a9f3454aaa,

title = "Why Might an Instrumentalist Endorse Bohmian Mechanics?",

abstract = "I show that Bohmian mechanics may be highly valued by anti-realists, such as cognitive instrumentalists, although it is typically understood to be a realist interpretation of quantum mechanics. I argue that it possesses significant theoretical virtues – and is a vehicle for fostering non-factive understanding concerning how many phenomena interrelate – even if it fails to be approximately true (or true to any significant degree in what it says about unobservable entities). I employ several examples from the history of science to illuminate and support this view.",

author = "ROWBOTTOM, {Darrell P.}",

note = "Funding Information: My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong{\textquoteright}s RGC ({\textquoteleft}Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues{\textquoteright}) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Funding Information: My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong{\textquoteright}s RGC ({\textquoteleft}Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues{\textquoteright}) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version. Funding Information: Acknowledgements My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong{\textquoteright}s RGC ({\textquoteleft}Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues{\textquoteright}) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-99642-0_6",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783030996413",

series = "Synthese Library",

publisher = "Springer, Cham",

pages = "81--94",

editor = "Valia ALLORI",

booktitle = "Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality : Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy",

}

Why Might an Instrumentalist Endorse Bohmian Mechanics? / ROWBOTTOM, Darrell P.

Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality : Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy. ed. / Valia ALLORI. Springer, Cham, 2022. p. 81-94 (Synthese Library; Vol. 460).

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference Proceedings › Book Chapter › Research › peer-review