Why Might an Instrumentalist Endorse Bohmian Mechanics?

Darrell P. ROWBOTTOM*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

I show that Bohmian mechanics may be highly valued by anti-realists, such as cognitive instrumentalists, although it is typically understood to be a realist interpretation of quantum mechanics. I argue that it possesses significant theoretical virtues – and is a vehicle for fostering non-factive understanding concerning how many phenomena interrelate – even if it fails to be approximately true (or true to any significant degree in what it says about unobservable entities). I employ several examples from the history of science to illuminate and support this view.

A Briton wants emotion in his science, something to raise enthusiasm,
something with human interest. He is not content with dry catalogues.
—George F. Fitzgerald (1896: 441)
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationQuantum Mechanics and Fundamentality : Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy
EditorsValia ALLORI
PublisherSpringer, Cham
Chapter6
Pages81-94
ISBN (Electronic)9783030996420
ISBN (Print)9783030996413
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2022

Publication series

NameSynthese Library
Volume460
ISSN (Print)0166-6991
ISSN (Electronic)2542-8292

Bibliographical note

My work on this paper was supported by a GRF Grant from Hong Kong’s RGC (‘Scientific Progress: Foundational Issues’) and the Center for Foundations of Science, University of Pittsburgh (via a Visiting Fellowship). I am also grateful to David Wallace and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier version.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Might an Instrumentalist Endorse Bohmian Mechanics?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this