Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Wild hopes: Sourcing the political vocabulary of digital citizenship from the LIHKG forum

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

In the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill resistance movement, Hong Kong netizens used a popular digital platform known as LIHKG (連登) as a communicative center to exchange time-based information, express outrage or solidarity, and assemble decentered actions of agitation. There was an implied sense that LIHKG was facilitating a “wild” mode of politics oriented toward agitation, disturbance, and chaos. This paper examines its “wild politics” and asks: how might we trace the evolution of a complex political vernacular capable of creating a chaotic form of organizing, and what did this vocabulary tell us about the latent meanings, desires, and identity-making of the networked protesters? Utilizing the LDA topic-modelling method, we analyzed a large corpus of discussion threads on LIHKG to develop a customized domain-specific thematic repertoire, and revealed a “language in the wild” as part of a cultural archive that embodied the netizens’ ambivalent hopes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-375
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Communication Gazette
Volume84
Issue number4
Early online date12 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

The authors thank our Research Assistant, Randy Zhihuai Lin, for his high efficiency and commitment to this project. He has made an important contribution to the data analysis part of the paper.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Funding

The computational analysis part in this study is supported by the Initiation Grant for Faculty Niche Research Areas, Hong Kong Baptist University (Ref. RC-IG-FNRA/17-18/02).

Keywords

  • anti-ELAB movement
  • digital activism
  • Hong Kong
  • LDA topic modelling
  • LIHKG forum

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wild hopes: Sourcing the political vocabulary of digital citizenship from the LIHKG forum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this