Abstract
We present evidence on the association between the management practices conventionally identified with high performance workplaces (HPWs) and measures of work–life balance. Our framework identifies those practices associated with workers reporting that their employer makes work–life balance commitments, and separately identifies those practices associated with workers reporting that their employer keeps the commitments they make. Our results do not support a role for HPWs in either the making or the keeping of work–life balance commitments. Rather, they suggest that where workers are interdependent – as in team production – the resulting inflexibility of time scheduling drives down work–life balance commitments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1976-1995 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | International Journal of Human Resource Management |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2010 |
Funding
This survey was commissioned by the UK Policy Studies Institute and conducted by Public Attitude Surveys, as part of the research study Changing employment relationships, employment contracts and the future of work funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
Keywords
- high performance workplaces
- motivation
- work incentives
- work–life balance