Worker sorting and job satisfaction : the case of union and government jobs

John S. HEYWOOD, W. S. SIEBERT, Xiangdong WEI

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In initial cross-section estimates using data from the 1991-94 British Household Panel Study, the authors find that union members had lower overall job satisfaction than non-union members, and public sector workers had higher satisfaction than private sector workers. Controlling for individual worker effects (sorting) using panel methods confirms the lower satisfaction of union members, but eliminates the higher satisfaction of public sector workers. These results suggest that unions do not simply attract the dissatisfied, as previously suggested. By contrast, the greater satisfaction expressed by public sector workers seems largely a consequence of sorting, with those who are more easily satisfied being drawn to the public sector. Additional analysis of particular aspects of satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, the work itself, and relations with the boss, generally supports these conclusions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-609
Number of pages15
JournalIndustrial and Labor Relations Review
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Workers
Sorting
Government
Job satisfaction
Public sector
Household
Panel study
Private sector
Cross section

Cite this

@article{06c303e169a547e3a4ed1ecab4ada5de,
title = "Worker sorting and job satisfaction : the case of union and government jobs",
abstract = "In initial cross-section estimates using data from the 1991-94 British Household Panel Study, the authors find that union members had lower overall job satisfaction than non-union members, and public sector workers had higher satisfaction than private sector workers. Controlling for individual worker effects (sorting) using panel methods confirms the lower satisfaction of union members, but eliminates the higher satisfaction of public sector workers. These results suggest that unions do not simply attract the dissatisfied, as previously suggested. By contrast, the greater satisfaction expressed by public sector workers seems largely a consequence of sorting, with those who are more easily satisfied being drawn to the public sector. Additional analysis of particular aspects of satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, the work itself, and relations with the boss, generally supports these conclusions.",
author = "HEYWOOD, {John S.} and SIEBERT, {W. S.} and Xiangdong WEI",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3270624",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "595--609",
journal = "ILR Review",
issn = "0019-7939",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Worker sorting and job satisfaction : the case of union and government jobs. / HEYWOOD, John S.; SIEBERT, W. S.; WEI, Xiangdong.

In: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.07.2002, p. 595-609.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worker sorting and job satisfaction : the case of union and government jobs

AU - HEYWOOD, John S.

AU - SIEBERT, W. S.

AU - WEI, Xiangdong

PY - 2002/7/1

Y1 - 2002/7/1

N2 - In initial cross-section estimates using data from the 1991-94 British Household Panel Study, the authors find that union members had lower overall job satisfaction than non-union members, and public sector workers had higher satisfaction than private sector workers. Controlling for individual worker effects (sorting) using panel methods confirms the lower satisfaction of union members, but eliminates the higher satisfaction of public sector workers. These results suggest that unions do not simply attract the dissatisfied, as previously suggested. By contrast, the greater satisfaction expressed by public sector workers seems largely a consequence of sorting, with those who are more easily satisfied being drawn to the public sector. Additional analysis of particular aspects of satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, the work itself, and relations with the boss, generally supports these conclusions.

AB - In initial cross-section estimates using data from the 1991-94 British Household Panel Study, the authors find that union members had lower overall job satisfaction than non-union members, and public sector workers had higher satisfaction than private sector workers. Controlling for individual worker effects (sorting) using panel methods confirms the lower satisfaction of union members, but eliminates the higher satisfaction of public sector workers. These results suggest that unions do not simply attract the dissatisfied, as previously suggested. By contrast, the greater satisfaction expressed by public sector workers seems largely a consequence of sorting, with those who are more easily satisfied being drawn to the public sector. Additional analysis of particular aspects of satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, the work itself, and relations with the boss, generally supports these conclusions.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2446

U2 - 10.2307/3270624

DO - 10.2307/3270624

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 55

SP - 595

EP - 609

JO - ILR Review

JF - ILR Review

SN - 0019-7939

IS - 4

ER -